<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Feedburner Stats Inflated?</title>
	<atom:link href="/2007/11/16/are-feedburner-stats-inflated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/2007/11/16/are-feedburner-stats-inflated/</link>
	<description>Tips and tricks to get technology to work for you, by Michael Boyd Clark</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2016 14:14:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Boyd Clark Journal/Blog &#187; Switch to my Feedburner Feed</title>
		<link>/2007/11/16/are-feedburner-stats-inflated/comment-page-1/#comment-14167</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Boyd Clark Journal/Blog &#187; Switch to my Feedburner Feed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetmike.com/journal/2007/11/16/are-feedburner-stats-inflated/#comment-14167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Are Feedburner Stats Inflated? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Are Feedburner Stats Inflated? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis de la Rosa</title>
		<link>/2007/11/16/are-feedburner-stats-inflated/comment-page-1/#comment-14137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luis de la Rosa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetmike.com/journal/2007/11/16/are-feedburner-stats-inflated/#comment-14137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve wondered the same thing before.  But I think one of the key determinants in how many readers you have is how regularly you post.  And of course what you write about and your writing style.

I just subscribed to your RSS feed - it&#039;ll show up as NetNewsWire in FeedBurner.

Also I wonder if this might be a temporary glitch - it might even out over time.  I remember when I first signed up for FeedBurner it had weird stats the first few days and then became more normal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve wondered the same thing before.  But I think one of the key determinants in how many readers you have is how regularly you post.  And of course what you write about and your writing style.</p>
<p>I just subscribed to your RSS feed &#8211; it&#8217;ll show up as NetNewsWire in FeedBurner.</p>
<p>Also I wonder if this might be a temporary glitch &#8211; it might even out over time.  I remember when I first signed up for FeedBurner it had weird stats the first few days and then became more normal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim King</title>
		<link>/2007/11/16/are-feedburner-stats-inflated/comment-page-1/#comment-14062</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim King]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetmike.com/journal/2007/11/16/are-feedburner-stats-inflated/#comment-14062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, Mike. I&#039;ve subscribed using Vienna (a Mac OS/X feed reader client).

-TimK]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Mike. I&#8217;ve subscribed using Vienna (a Mac OS/X feed reader client).</p>
<p>-TimK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
